✔︎ Bill C-62 (medical assistance in dying)

Bill

Bill C-62, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying), No. 2

Vote

Yea.

Rationale

Bill C-62 extends the exclusion of eligibility for receiving medical assistance in dying (MAID) in circumstances where the sole underlying medical condition identified is a mental illness (MI-SUMC) for a period of 3 years, until March 17, 2027. The Bill also proposes that within two years after royal assent, a Joint Committee of Parliament undertake a review relating to eligibility of persons whose sole condition is a mental illness. If it prepares a report, it must table it with each house of Parliament.

Passed.

Bill Status

Royal Assent received

✘ Bill C-314 (medical assistance in dying)

Bill

Bill C-314, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)

Vote

Nay.

Rationale

The Government acknowledges the complexity of the issue and surrounding concerns, but emphasize that it is confident that the healthcare system and practitioners will be ready to safely and consistently provide MAID where the sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness by March 17, 2024.

Failed.

Bill Status

Bill defeated

✘ Bill C-230, Protection of Freedom of Conscience Act

Bill

Bill C-230, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (intimidation of healthcare professionals)

Vote

Nay.

Rationale

Bill C-230’s proposed intimidation offence prohibiting the use of violence, threats of violence, coercion or intimidation to compel participation in MAiD would be largely duplicative of other Criminal Code offences and offer no additional protection to healthcare professionals. Specifically, the Criminal Code prohibits all forms of assault and uttering threats to cause bodily harm or death or damage property.

Failed.

Bill Status

Bill defeated.

Debate on Medical Assistance in Dying (Bill C-14)

Speaking on Medical Assistance in Dying (Bill C-14) on behalf of Cloverdale - Langley City - May 2, 2016

My statement on Medical Assistance in Dying (Bill C-14)

"Mr. Speaker,

I rise in the House today in support of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make related amendements to other Acts, also known as Medical Assistance in Dying or MAID. In January, I was appointed to the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying and I was excited for the opportunity to be a part of the change that many Canadians have been waiting for.

Over the span of a couple of months, my fellow committee members and I spent a lot of time working to understand the complex issue of Medical Assistance in Dying. We discussed, we debated, and we even disagreed on a few issues, but in the end, we drafted a report that I felt was the best possible solution for this complex social and legal issue.

Drafting any legislation can be difficult, but it becomes especially difficult when the title includes “death or dying”. It is a topic that most of us are sensitive towards, and many have difficulty confronting.

Within the Special Joint Committee, we dealt head on with a number of difficult issues, and were immersed in them for 6 weeks. We reviewed reports by the Provincial-Territorial Expert Advisory Group on Physician-Assisted Dying, Healthcare regulatory bodies throughout Canada, and the federal External Panel on Options for a Legislative Response to Carter v. Canada, to name a few.

We had the challenging task of grappling with a few major issues touched on by Bill C-14, which included the availability of Medical Assistance in Dying for mature minors, patients with mental illness, advance consent, conscientious objection and inevitably, ensuring that adequate safeguards were in place to protect the vulnerable.

On February 25th, the Special Joint Committee reported back to Parliament, where the Ministers of Justice and Health took the report into consideration, and began drafting Bill C-14, which is what I am here to discuss today.

Bill C-14 reflects a number of recommendations made by the Special Joint Committee, which include:

1. allowing both Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide

2. being permanent residents of Canada, so as not to encourage, what some have coined as, “suicide or death tourism”

3. requiring a written request for medical assistance in dying

4. requiring 2 witnesses during the time of request

5. requiring confirmation from 2 doctors or nurse practitioners that the person making the request meets all of the criteria for MAID; and

6. requiring a mandatory statutory review

The key message I have taken from this very difficult discussion that I was part of, and that Canadians are now joining, is that this has to be a patient-centered discussion. I encourage all parliamentarians to set aside personal values and beliefs and focus on what is in the best interest of patients. Medical assistance in dying is, and should only be, about the patient.

Upon reflection of our committee work, I now realize that the committee managed to develop a higher level of comfort with this difficult topic than is held by most Canadians at this point in the public discourse on MAID. So I am glad to see that the Government took the overarching perspective of Canadians into consideration and is willing to use this legislation as a stepping stone for further studies and future re-visitation.

In the past few months I have hosted and co-hosted medical assistance in dying townhalls. I have spoken directly to my constituents. I have listened to the concerns of my constituents and of many Canadians around the country, and just last week, there was a demonstration for Bill C-14 held at my Constituency Office. I’ve heard the positive, the negative, the concerns, and the support, and although I fully support this legislation, I believe there are a few voids that have yet to be filled.

Firstly, during the demonstration last week, an important criteria, or better yet lack of criteria, of the bill was brought into question. How does one maintain safeguards when dealing with non-medical personnel? Bill C-14 ensures protections are met for non-medical personnel who participate in Medical Assistance in Dying, including those who aid a person, at that person’s explicit request, to self-administer a substance prescribed as part of the provision of MAID, by amending sections 241 of the Criminal Code, and introducing section 227 to allow MAID if the appropriate conditions are met.

But, what is being done to ensure that non-medical personnel are in fact following the guidelines required by MAID? For instance, right before the time of administering the lethal prescription, a patient must be asked whether they would like to continue with MAID, but how do we know that these independent individuals are in fact asking this question, among others? How do we know that the individual will not take advantage of the situation or the vulnerable position that the patient is in? These are questions my constituents would like to see addressed.

Secondly, I recently spoke to someone who was heavily involved in the Carter V. Canada case, who was wondering whether Kay Carter herself would have qualified for Medical Assistance in Dying given the legislation being discussed today. I’ve read articles stating that she would have been, because she met the criteria for eligibility. But would health-care practitioners consistently agree that Kay Carter would indeed have qualified under this legislation?

The part that I am finding difficult to grasp, for Kay Carter, and many others, is the ambiguity of the criterion for imminent death. How do we know that individuals will not be turned away from the service of MAID, because of the vague nature of this criterion. Who is responsible for deciding the criteria for imminent death? Will there be inconsistencies in the definition of imminent death? How will we, as society, address these?

Lastly, the hard timeline between the date of request and the day on which medical assistance in dying would be provided was yet another point of concern. Many constituents have expressed concerns that this may lead to the hastening of death, because the timeline was simply too short. The Special Joint Committee had recommended a flexible waiting period, which would depend on the nature of the illness, as opposed to just an “imminent death.” It would be suggested that imminence and competence not be the only factors in determining the timeline, but much rather “the rapidity of progression and nature of the patient’s medical condition” be used when determining the reflection period.

These are a few pieces of the proposed legislation that my constituents and I feel need to be clarified and tightened before the final legislation is created for June 6, 2016.

However, I also want to acknowledge that the legislation has done a great job of addressing a number of concerns that have been conveyed by my constituents and many others. For instance, the first misconception that I would like to clear up is that Bill C-14 does not address the conscientious objections of medical personnel. It does.

There is nothing in the proposed legislation that would compel a healthcare provider to provide medical assistance in dying or refer a patient to another medical practitioner. Balancing the rights of medical providers and those of patients is generally a matter of provincial and territorial responsibility and we need to respect that. However, that being said, the federal government has committed to work with provinces and territories to support access to medical assistance in dying, while respecting the personal convictions of health care providers.”

Bill C-14 also “recognizes the autonomy of persons who have a grievous and irremediable medical condition that causes them enduring and intolerable suffering and who wish to seek medical assistance in dying,” while recognizing the importance of protecting the vulnerable and ensuring adequate safeguards are in place.

In addition to the Government’s commitment on medical assistance in dying, as suggested in Bill C-14, the government is committed to improving end of life-care services; “The Government of Canada has made a commitment to develop non-legislative measures that would support the improvement of a full range of options for end-of-life care.” It has also committed to providing $3 billion over the next 4 years to improve home care, which includes palliative care. While this may not be enough to cover the deficiencies across the country, it is definitely the beginning of a long-term approach to ensuring access to palliative care for increased numbers of Canadians.

Over the past 4 months I have encountered a wide variety of perspectives about this complex and difficult issue. Some have been extremely restrictive, while others have been extremely permissive. Some believe that the legislation goes too far, while others believe it does not go far enough.

I believe that Bill C-14 is an important first step in Canada. It is a cautious, even conservative piece of legislation but it provides a necessary first response to the Carter decision, along with a commitment to continue studying the effects and revisiting important issues of MAID in the future.

A local paper - The Langley Times did a piece on the demonstration that took place at my Cloverdale-Langley City riding office last week and stated that “Despite the contentious nature of the issue, discussions appear to have been largely respectful and constructive leading up to new federal legislation on [Medical Assistance in Dying].” So to all of my constituents who have emailed, called, attended townhalls, and everyone who has voiced their opinion on Medical Assistance in Dying in a respectful manner, thank you. I appreciate and encourage the feedback. Our government will continue to ask for your input on this and other issues.

Dr. Cindy Forbes, of the Canadian Medical Association has indicated support for Bill C-14, which she made evident in her statement on April 14th, when she said that the “…commitment to exploring mechanisms to support patient access and respect the personal convictions of health care providers will be critical to the pan-Canadian framework on medical assistance in dying. We applaud the federal government for making this commitment.”

Ultimately, when it comes to Bill C-14, I would like to see the voids found within the legislation to be addressed prior to June 6th and I intend on supporting Bill C-14. Like Dr. Forbes, I encourage my colleagues, on both sides of the House, to support the rights of Canadians, and to put patients first, by supporting Bill C-14.

Thank you Mr. Speaker."

Proposed Medical Assistance in Dying Legislation

Proposed federal approach respects personal choice while protecting vulnerable persons

April 14, 2016 – Ottawa, Ontario

Medical assistance in dying is a difficult and deeply personal issue for all Canadians. It is important to defend people's choices and freedoms in a way that protects the most vulnerable, and also supports the personal convictions of health care providers.

Today, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Jody Wilson-Raybould, together with the Minister of Health, Jane Philpott, announced that proposed legislation has been introduced that would give dying patients, who are suffering intolerably from a serious medical condition, the choice of a medically-assisted death.

The proposed legislation has been developed following the Supreme Court of Canada's unanimous decision in Carter v. Canada to strike down the criminal laws against physician-assisted dying. It is the result of extensive consultations with individuals, groups and experts, at home and abroad, and takes into account a range of interests, including personal autonomy and safeguards to protect the vulnerable. This is a compassionate approach that considers all these interests.

John Aldag, Member of Parliament for Cloverdale-Langley City was appointed to the Special Joint Committee on Physician Assisted Dying. The Committee worked diligently to respond as requested, and on time, by making recommendations that are in the interest of the people of Canada. The Committee’s recommendations were based in part on the thought-provoking submissions the Committee received through more than 20 hours of witness testimony as well as in written briefs.

"I'm pleased that our government tabled this important legislation in the House of Commons today. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that medical assistance in dying is now legal in Canada. As legislators, we must now move this bill through the legislative process to meet the Court-imposed deadline of June 6. The bill is cautious in its approach to this sensitive topic, which reflects the position that many Canadians have taken on this issue. I will be holding a town hall meeting to provide an update on the legislation that was tabled and invite comment from the residents of Cloverdale - Langley City” said Aldag, Member of Parliament for Cloverdale-Langley City and a member of the Special Joint Committee on Physician Assisted Dying “I encourage the constituents to reach out to me if they have questions or concerns at 604-595-6595 or at john.aldag@parl.gc.ca”

The proposed legislation was developed in line with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It would ensure a consistent approach to medical assistance in dying across Canada while recognizing the jurisdiction of provinces and territories over the delivery of health care services.

The proposed measures would revise the Criminal Code to exempt health care practitioners who provide, or help to provide, medical assistance in dying, from otherwise applicable criminal offences.

Moving forward, the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Health will appoint one or more independent bodies to study how medical assistance in dying could apply to the issue of advance requests, mature minors, and individuals with mental illnesses.

"Medical assistance in dying is a sensitive, complex issue and many Canadians have deeply-held views on the subject. Recognizing the inherent dignity and equality of all Canadians, we are proposing the choice of a peaceful death for patients with a serious medical condition who are irreversibly declining and suffering intolerably. After the Supreme Court of Canada's (SCC) unanimous decision in Carter, it was no longer a question of whether we would have medical assistance in dying in Canada, but how it would be made available. Based on the current evidence, we believe this is the best approach to ensure that dying patients who are suffering unbearable pain have the choice of a peaceful death and that the vulnerable are protected."

- The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

"Every Canadian deserves access to timely and high-quality health care, including at the end of life. The Government of Canada is grateful for the work of the Special Joint Committee, and will engage with the provinces and territories to support consistency in the delivery of medical assistance in dying, as well as to develop a pan- Canadian monitoring system to collect and analyze data, monitor trends and publicly report on the new regime. To implement our commitment to support a full range of end-of-life care options, we will continue to work with provinces and territories to improve palliative care as part of discussions on a new Health Accord. We will also explore options to support access to medical assistance in dying, while supporting the personal convictions of health care providers."

- The Honourable Jane Philpott, Minister of Health

For more information:

Gunraj Gill
Office of John Aldag, Member of Parliament
778-389-6353
john.aldag.a1@parl.gc.ca

Proposed Federal Approach Respects Personal Choice while Protecting Vulnerable Persons

April 14, 2016 - Ottawa, Ontario

Medical assistance in dying is a difficult and deeply personal issue for all Canadians. It is important to defend people's choices and freedoms in a way that protects the most vulnerable, and also supports the personal convictions of health care providers.

Today, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Jody Wilson-Raybould, together with the Minister of Health, Jane Philpott, announced that proposed legislation has been introduced that would give dying patients, who are suffering intolerably from a serious medical condition, the choice of a medically-assisted death.

The proposed legislation has been developed following the Supreme Court of Canada's unanimous decision in Carter v. Canada to strike down the criminal laws against physician-assisted dying. It is the result of extensive consultations with individuals, groups and experts, at home and abroad, and takes into account a range of interests, including personal autonomy and safeguards to protect the vulnerable. This is a compassionate approach that considers all these interests.

John Aldag, Member of Parliament for Cloverdale-Langley City was appointed to the Special Joint Committee on Physician Assisted Dying. The Committee worked diligently to respond as requested, and on time, by making recommendations that are in the interest of the people of Canada. The Committee’s recommendations were based in part on the thought-provoking submissions the Committee received through more than 20 hours of witness testimony as well as in written briefs.

“Quote on the specifics of the legislation – i.e eligibility, safeguards etc.”

- John Aldag, Member of Parliament for Cloverdale-Langley City and Member of the Special Joint Committee on Physician Assisted Dying

The proposed legislation was developed in line with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It would ensure a consistent approach to medical assistance in dying across Canada while recognizing the jurisdiction of provinces and territories over the delivery of health care services.

The proposed measures would revise the Criminal Code to exempt health care practitioners who provide, or help to provide, medical assistance in dying, from otherwise applicable criminal offences.

Moving forward, the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Health will appoint one or more independent bodies to study how medical assistance in dying could apply to the issue of advance requests, mature minors, and individuals with mental illnesses.

Quick Facts

"Medical assistance in dying is a sensitive, complex issue and many Canadians have deeply-held views on the subject. Recognizing the inherent dignity and equality of all Canadians, we are proposing the choice of a peaceful death for patients with a serious medical condition who are irreversibly declining and suffering intolerably. After the Supreme Court of Canada's (SCC) unanimous decision in Carter, it was no longer a question of whether we would have medical assistance in dying in Canada, but how it would be made available. Based on the current evidence, we believe this is the best approach to ensure that dying patients who are suffering unbearable pain have the choice of a peaceful death and that the vulnerable are protected."

- The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

"Every Canadian deserves access to timely and high-quality health care, including at the end of life. The Government of Canada is grateful for the work of the Special Joint Committee, and will engage with the provinces and territories to support consistency in the delivery of medical assistance in dying, as well as to develop a pan-Canadian monitoring system to collect and analyze data, monitor trends and publicly report on the new regime. To implement our commitment to support a full range of end-of-life care options, we will continue to work with provinces and territories to improve palliative care as part of discussions on a new Health Accord. We will also explore options to support access to medical assistance in dying, while supporting the personal convictions of health care providers."

- The Honourable Jane Philpott, Minister of HealthFor more information:

For more information:

Gunraj Gill
Office of John Aldag, Member of Parliament
778-389-6353
john.aldag.a1@parl.gc.ca

Medical Assistance in Dying: A Patient-Centred Approach

February 25, 2016 - Ottawa, Ontario

Cloverdale-Langley City MP John Aldag is a member of The Special Joint Parliamentary Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying (PDAM). The committee tabled its report, Medical Assistance in Dying: A Patient-Centred Approach, in the Senate today and also presented the report in the House of Commons.

In February 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) that in certain circumstances, the provisions of the Criminal Code that prohibit medical assistance in dying violate the rights of individuals that are protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

On December 11, 2015, the Senate and the House of Commons passed motions to establish a special joint committee whose mandate was to:

Review the report of the External Panel on Options for a Legislative Response to Carter v. Canada and other recent relevant consultation activities and studies, to consult with Canadians, experts and stakeholders, and make recommendations on the framework of a federal response on physician-assisted dying that respects the Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the priorities of Canadians.

Guided by the Court’s decision, the Committee worked diligently to respond as requested, and on time, by making recommendations that are in the interest of the people of Canada.
Senators and Members of Parliament worked collaboratively and constructively to grapple with serious issues in a thoughtful and reflective manner.

“The work of the Special Joint Committee, of which I was a part, gathered evidence from diverse interests on this important topic. We must now move forward and ensure that the legislation to come respects the rights and views of Canadians and the Carter decision” stated John Aldag, Member of Parliament for Cloverdale-Langley City. “I encourage everyone to read the full report and get engaged in the process of crafting a framework on Medical Aid in Dying.”

The Committee’s recommendations are based in part on the thought-provoking submissions the Committee received through more than 20 hours of witness testimony as well as in written briefs. 

The Committee’s deliberations were also informed by all of the Canadian research and consultations that have taken place on this complex and sensitive issue. The Committee commends the work done by the External Panel on Options for a Legislative Response to Carter v. Canada, the Provincial-Territorial Expert Advisory Group on Physician-Assisted Dying, the Canadian Medical Association, and the provincial colleges of physicians of surgeons.

In its report, the Committee makes 21 recommendations, including:

• “That medical assistance in dying be available to individuals with terminal and non-terminal grievous and irremediable medical conditions that cause enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition”;
• “That the capacity of a person requesting medical assistance in dying to provide informed consent should be assessed using existing medical practices, emphasizing the need to pay particular attention to vulnerabilities in end-of-life circumstances”; “That the permission to use advance requests for medical assistance in dying be allowed any time after one is diagnosed with a condition that is reasonably likely to cause loss of competence or after a diagnosis of a grievous or irremediable condition but before the suffering becomes intolerable”; and
• “That physicians, nurse practitioners and registered nurses working under the direction of a physician to provide medical assistance in dying be exempted from sections 14 and section 241(b) of the Criminal Code.
• Pharmacists and other health care practitioners, who provide services relating to medical assistance in dying, should also be exempted from sections 14 and section 241(b) of the Criminal Code.”

For More Information:

Gunraj Gill
Office of John Aldag, Member of Parliament
778-389-6353
John.Aldag.A1@parl.gc.ca